#6163 Request for review of mash patch
Closed: Fixed None Opened 9 years ago by ralph.

I sent out two patches against mash:

I received a response in March in IRC stating that patches wouldn't achieve anything, but that seems incorrect to me. They obviously make the codebase more flexible. I'd like to have them reviewed and included.

I'm flagging this as a meeting item to try and get more eyes on it so it can be closed and put behind us.


From today's meeting: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-04-27/releng.2015-04-27-15.31.log.txt

{{{
dgilmore │ https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6163
dgilmore │ so I do not want to spend time in the meeting reviewing patches
threebean │ sure. can we commit someone to review it and resolve it out of band then?
dgilmore │ I will remove the meeting keyword and it can be discussed on list or in #fedora-releng
}}}

Ralph, looks like this patch was merged, can we close this out?

I think we should as mash is now in pagure and if it's not reviewed and merged there should be a pull request submitted there anyway now as it's easier to track state there

This was merged upstream in mash, and python-multilib supports configurable black/white lists as well. https://github.com/Zyzyx/python-multilib/blob/master/multilib/multilib.py

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata