Right, it was pointed out during the code review of the patch that introduced the bug that it's pointless to check the return code b/c there's nothing we can do about an error anyway.

But we should be silencing Coverity, please check the return value and issue a SSSDBG_MINOR_FAILURE warning. Please be careful not to overwrite ret.

Fields changed

patch: 0 => 1

Fields changed

owner: somebody => mzidek
status: new => assigned
version: 1.9.3 => 1.9.4

• master: cc542ca

milestone: NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD 1.10 beta
resolution: => fixed
status: assigned => closed

Fields changed

rhbz: => 0

There seems to be another occurrence in files.c:

781 done:
At conditional (8): "dir" taking the true branch.
CID 13129: Unchecked return value (CHECKED_RETURN)Calling function "closedir" without checking return value (as is done elsewhere 4 out of 5 times).
No check of the return value of "closedir(dir)".
782    if (dir) closedir(dir);
783
784    if (dest_dir_fd != -1) {
785        close(dest_dir_fd);
786    }
787    return ret;
788}

resolution: fixed =>
status: closed => reopened

Also pushed to sssd-1-9: 1117cf6

milestone: SSSD 1.10 beta => SSSD 1.9.5
resolution: => fixed
status: reopened => closed

SSSD is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests
will be accepted only in SSSD's github repository.

This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here:
- https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/2833

If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue
and click on subscribe button.

Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.