#5975 Please remove the following retired 'EPEL 5' packages from the 'ppc' epel-5 tree
Closed: Fixed None Opened 9 years ago by mharmsen.

I continue to receive the following messages even though according to the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb Fedora Package Database], all four of these packages have been retired for EPEL-5:
{{{
pki-console has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
pki-console-1.3.2-1.el5.noarch requires java >= 1:1.6.0
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
}}}

{{{
pki-ra has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
pki-ra-1.3.1-1.el5.noarch requires pki-silent
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
}}}

{{{
pki-tps has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
pki-tps-1.3.1-1.el5.ppc requires pki-silent
On x86_64:
pki-tps-1.3.1-1.el5.i386 requires libssldap60.so
pki-tps-1.3.1-1.el5.i386 requires libprldap60.so
pki-tps-1.3.1-1.el5.i386 requires libldif60.so
pki-tps-1.3.1-1.el5.i386 requires libldap60.so
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
}}}

{{{
tomcatjss has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
tomcatjss-1.2.1-1.el5.noarch requires java >= 1:1.6.0
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
}}}

Please remove these packages from whatever automated 'ppc' build is trying to utilize them.


Why were they retired? They lack a dead.package file describing the reason.

Replying to [comment:1 till]:

Why were they retired? They lack a dead.package file describing the reason.

I do not know how long these packages have actually been retired, however, it should be noted that none of these packages have been touched in over four years:

The 'pki-console', 'pki-ra', and 'pki-tps' packages are part of a RHEL 5 layered product that has never been supported on the 'ppc' platform.

The 'tomcatjss' package is a low-level component that is utilized solely by this RHEL 5 layered product and therefore has also never been supported on the 'ppc' platform.

Further, there was a determination at one point in the distant past that EPEL packages would no longer be built for this specific RHEL 5 layered product. (I do not know if the 'dead.package' file that you refer to was even the method utilized at that time).

The dead.package file is already use for a long time. It is explained here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

I added a dead.package file and blocked the packages in koji (this was not done for primary as well), they should be properly removed with the next push.

Metadata Update from @mharmsen:
- Issue set to the milestone: Fedora 20 Final

7 years ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata