= Proposal topic =
Allow QA members to run for FESCo.
= Overview =
Current [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FESCo_election_policy FESCo election policy] states that candidates must be members of the 'packager' group in FAS: {{{Candidates may be any member of the packager group in the Fedora Accounts System.}}} However with John we now have a [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations#John_Dulaney_.28j_dulaney.29 candidate from QA].
= Problem space =
The requirement that candidates must be from the packagers group is a relic from the time when there was no official QA group. Now that we have one, we should allow these people to run for FESCo
= Solution Overview =
Allow members from the packager and QA to run for FESCo.
= Active Ingredients =
FESCo election policy
= Owners =
cwickert
For the record: QA currently has 10 members, most of them are packagers already, see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/qa
And of course I am +1 to my own proposal :)
FESCo decision:
jdulaney is acceptable candidate for this FESCo elections
mjg59 will start discussion about candidates for FESCo on fedora-devel -> next meeting
Didn't see the discussion - my proposal would be some combination of packager, qa, proventester, rel-eng.
We're not enthusiastic about just adding QA, and right now we don't have a solid idea what a real solution would look like. Closing for now until someone brings another proposal.
Login to comment on this ticket.