#176 wiki information regarding FESCo seems to be outdated
Closed None Opened 14 years ago by till.

The following pages seem not to be used anymore and instead this trac instance is used:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/Schedule
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/FescoProposalTemplate


Yeah, for the Schedule page I think we can look for anything outstanding and file it as a trac ticket, then archive the page.

For the Proposal Template is there some way to import that into trac for new tickets to use as a template?

I thought that I'd replied to this ticket on the day it was opened. But I guess not :(

The schedule page looks like a disaster area ATM - it's very disjointed (containing things about the schedule for the "next" meeting, EPEL?!?!, and the feature process), and in need of either serious repair or simply replacing it with "click here for the schedule"

The template page I went ahead and removed the "proposed for deletion" and mentioned that the template could be used to file a ticket in this trac instance. As far as actually integrating it, I'm not sure if that's possible or not, I'll definitely look into it.

Putting on meeting schedule to delegate someone to Do It.

As for integrating the template with trac, there is a template plugin available for trac, it even works with 0.10 :)

I'll package it this evening when I get home from work and get a package review in. Trac plugins are pretty trivial packages :)

Setting assignee per 2009-08-07 FESCo meeting.

I've done some cleanups to Development/Schedule during and right after last week's meeting. I also fixed the conversion errors in the old "closed issues" page. What's left to do is to sort out the "FESCo Open Issues" section of Development/Schedule:
* point to Trac for submitting new proposals (easy, I'll just do that),
* clean up or remove the table (I'm not sure about that one, at least the "standing events" seem to be still pertinent).

The part about submitting new proposals now just points to the Meeting Guidelines (before, it did that, then suggested alternative methods to bring something up). I updated the Meeting Guidelines to match our current Trac-based workflow.

Now we just have that table to take care of.

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata