Ticket #1179 (closed general: worksforme)

Opened 22 months ago

Last modified 9 months ago

Interactions of the various Products

Reported by: mitr Owned by:
Priority: major Keywords:
Cc: Blocked By:
Blocking:

Description

Before the WGs start forming themselves and defining their products, is there any minimum that FESCo expects from them, and that would therefore be useful to define in advance?

I have drafted https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora.next/ProductInteractions , which basically amounts to "we want to be able to run Cloud network services on the Server, and develop them on the Workstation" and the minimum necessary to achieve that.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 22 months ago by mitr

Agreed(+5): We do not necessarily need to define these interactions yet.

comment:2 Changed 22 months ago by mmaslano

  • Keywords meeting removed

Last week was decided to postpone this issue after plan from Working groups. Let's leave it out from meeting until than.

comment:3 Changed 20 months ago by toshio

  • Keywords Jan2014 added

comment:4 Changed 18 months ago by toshio

  • Keywords Meeting added

PRDs are in, time to put this back on the agenda. One thing to talk about is whether we want to have somethings that are necessary for all Fedora Products (SELinux on; systemd as the init system; running syslog, cron, and smtp daemons; linux kernel; etc). And if so, whether we want the Base Design WG to do that.

comment:5 Changed 18 months ago by toshio

We didn't get a chance to discuss this at today's meeting due to lack of time. FESCo members were encouraged to add other interactions that they are aware of to this ticket.

comment:6 Changed 18 months ago by tmraz

  • AGREED: FESCo wants Fedora to continue to have a core set of features that all Products must implement. We'll defer decisions about who decides on these core features and what those features cover until after we get more input from Products about how they are expecting to diverge. (+7, -0, 0:0) (t8m, 18:55:12)

comment:7 Changed 18 months ago by tmraz

  • Keywords Jan2014 Meeting removed

comment:8 Changed 9 months ago by sgallagh

This has been idle for eight months. Shall we close this as worksforme at this point?

comment:9 Changed 9 months ago by mitr

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to worksforme

I guess; there is no benefit in keeping this open, issues can be raised as separate tickets.

(I am still hoping for “we want to be able to run Cloud network services on the Server, and develop them on the Workstation” though.)

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.