#111 Provenpackager request: kanarip
Closed None Opened 15 years ago by jstanley.

No Description Provided


1) I do not agree with my removal from the provenpackager group. I do not see why I was removed in the first place and I was a member of cvsextras before it even existed.

2) As the owner and/or co-maintainer of 44 packages, I think I'm eligible for provenpackager membership (and I shouldn't have been removed).

3) As the maintainer of ruby, I need the ability to quickly fix/rebuild packages depending on ruby where the need arises. For example, Ruby 1.9.1 is on it's way into Fedora. Another example is CVEs being issued. Again, provenpackager is a pre-requisite here. I shouldn't have been removed.

This now becomes critical. Allow me to update the ruby* packages or go do it yourself. Sorry if that sounds like I'm pissed, but I am. The maintainer of some of these packages does not have his Fedora password reset and is thus unreachable through his @fedoraproject.org account. Thanks!

I move that we vote on this in the ticket here, and not wait for the meeting.

+1 from me.

+1, and what jwb said.

+1

No personal slight was intended, in fact the majority of the group was removed as part of the reseed, and a new process implemented for gaining access - be a sponsor or be voted on by FESCo.

This was announced multiple times, and there was a special FESCo session specifically to resolve issues like this ~24 hours after the change was made.

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata