Some ports defined in _constants.py are invalid: PORT_CONSUMER_6 = 66389 PORT_CONSUMER_7 = 67389 PORT_CONSUMER_8 = 68389 PORT_CONSUMER_9 = 69389
I propose a new scheme for naming ports 389XY instead of old XY389. It's not only fixes the invalid port assignment, but also provides a quicker way for labeling ports with semanage using port range. This is useful in CI where we can pre-label ports before running tests to save time because semanage takes significant amount of it. By pre-labeling (and disabling label removal in setup-ds.pl) I was able to shave execution time from 72 minutes to 34.
attachment 0001-Change-default-ports-for-standalone-topology.patch
Thanks, Mark!
To ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/389/lib389.git d336241..a829ae6 master -> master commit a829ae642ab37e851ebde6d5181d702f58ee87d1 Author: Viktor Ashirov vashirov@redhat.com Date: Fri Mar 11 16:53:06 2016 +0100
Metadata Update from @vashirov: - Issue set to the milestone: 0.0 NEEDS_TRIAGE
Metadata Update from @vashirov: - Issue set to the milestone: None (was: 0.0 NEEDS_TRIAGE)
389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.
This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here: - https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/1825
If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue and click on subscribe button.
subscribe
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.
Metadata Update from @spichugi: - Issue close_status updated to: wontfix (was: Fixed)
Login to comment on this ticket.