https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751415
Someone a very long time ago decided it would be a good idea to have rw locks and implemented them using regular mutexes and condition variables. I suspect this performs much worse than native pthread rwlocks. Now that we have native platform support for rwlocks we should use them.
0001-Ticket-15-Get-rid-of-rwlock.h-rwlock.c-and-just-use-.patch 0001-Ticket-15-Get-rid-of-rwlock.h-rwlock.c-and-just-use-.patch
diffs-without-autoconf.patch diffs-without-autoconf.patch
To ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/389/ds.git 363987a..584dc80 master -> master commit changeset:584dc80/389-ds-base Author: Rich Megginson rmeggins@redhat.com Date: Wed Jan 18 13:58:02 2012 -0700 Reviewed by: nhosoi (Thanks!) Branch: master Fix Description: Get rid of slapd rwlock rwl API and use slapi_rwlock instead. the lib/base/rwlock code was not used at all, so get rid of it Platforms tested: RHEL6 x86_64 Flag Day: Yes - header file and autoconf file changes Doc impact: no
Added initial screened field value.
Metadata Update from @rmeggins: - Issue assigned to rmeggins - Issue set to the milestone: 1.2.10.a7
389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.
This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here: - https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/15
If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue and click on subscribe button.
subscribe
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.
Metadata Update from @spichugi: - Issue close_status updated to: wontfix (was: Fixed)
Login to comment on this ticket.