Hi,

What time do we expect the Test Compose to be ready today?

Thank you,
John

Are we pulling fixes for Blocker / NTH issues from updates-testing, since this is a TC not an RC? just so we're closer to what's likely to be in the RCs...

Images coming later tonight. I took the morning off sick.

Nth builds wanted. Please list them here if you have them handy.

Adding builds:

pm-utils-1.3.1-2.fc14
valide-0.7.0-7.20100923bzr557.fc14
libgdl-2.30.1-1.fc14
spacewalk-certs-tools-0.7.2-1.fc14
intellij-idea-9.0.1.94.399-12.fc14
anaconda-14.19-1.fc14
system-config-language-1.3.5-4.fc14
parted-2.3-3.fc14
perl-5.12.2-135.fc14
gnome-pilot-conduits-2.0.17-5.fc14
hail-0.8-0.2.gf9c5b967.1.fc14
valide-0.7.0-7.20100923bzr557.fc14
rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-4.fc14
eclipse-ptp-4.0.3-3.fc14

The above was gathered from things with builds available from Fedora 14 Final: Accepted Bugs

TC1 posted to the ever confusing http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1.1/Fedora/ directory. It should be mirrored over to serverbeach soon.

I think that name could cause major confusion - it might have been better to just overwrite the old images in place. Rhe has already created the install and desktop test pages, using the name "TC1". Of course I'll make sure the download links there are correct, but a lot of people just go directly to the download server.

Damn, why did no-one create a live image ticket? Creating one now. Really need live images. Nightlies are no use if we're using side repos.

https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4201

Replying to [comment:8 robatino]:

I think that name could cause major confusion - it might have been better to just overwrite the old images in place. Rhe has already created the install and desktop test pages, using the name "TC1". Of course I'll make sure the download links there are correct, but a lot of people just go directly to the download server.

I saw you adding the IMPORTANT note in the announcement, I've also added a note in both test pages to emphasize downloading 14.TC1.1.

Another solution, just remove the TC.1 directory. I'll do that.

TC2 is expected for the split-media install fixes, right? I noticed 14.TC1.2 is on sb1, is it supposed to be this one? So far 14.TC1.2 only contains netinst.iso which timestamp is Oct 12, so I guess it's not the correct one?

And both Andre and I prefer to name the directory as TC.2 for new builds to reduce confusion. Thanks.

We aren't likely to advertise any "TC2". TC2 would indicate newer packages involved. We did not pull in any new packages when I created TC1.2, instead I used a newer pungi version to re-create the isos from TC1.1, which we are only going to use (quietly) to verify the pungi change. All public testing should continue with TC1.1 aka "TC1".

Replying to [comment:14 jkeating]:

We aren't likely to advertise any "TC2". TC2 would indicate newer packages involved. We did not pull in any new packages when I created TC1.2, instead I used a newer pungi version to re-create the isos from TC1.1, which we are only going to use (quietly) to verify the pungi change. All public testing should continue with TC1.1 aka "TC1".

Agreed, if there aren't any packaging or installer changes, I'd also recommend working to complete planned test execution against the official TC1 ISO images. One-off ISO images definitely make sense to verify the pungi split-media issue.